ECCTA & the Corporate Governance Code’s Provision29: One framework – complete compliance

Transform dual regulatory pressure into a single governance advantage. ECCTA’s “failure to prevent fraud” requirements have been in force since September 2025, and Provision 29’s board effectiveness declarations begin for financial years starting 1 January 2026.

Most organisations treat these as separate compliance exercises, creating potential risks and inefficiencies in terms of duplication, inconsistent reporting and governance complexity. Forward-thinking companies are discovering the integration opportunity.

The reality: Your ECCTA work already started your Provision 29 framework – you just need to connect the dots.

Requirements & who should act

Although the new requirements formally apply to companies as detailed below, they represent good governance practice for organisations of all sizes – and early action will enhance resilience across the organisation.

ECCTA: In force since September 2025

 Applies to:

  • Large/medium companies: £36M+ turnover, 250+ employees or £18M+ balance sheet

Key requirements:

  • Risk assessment and fraud prevention procedures
  • Active monitoring and robust documentation
  • Clear accountability and board oversight

Non-compliance risks:

  • Unlimited fines
  • Criminal liability
  • Reputational damage

Provision 29: Framework needed from 1 January 2026

Applies to:

  • Premium listed companies: Mandatory for financial years starting 1 January 2026
  • Expected to influence all listed and any private companies

Timeline clarification: Controls must operate effectively throughout 2026, with first declarations published in annual reports Q1 2027

Key requirements: 

  • Annual board review of control effectiveness throughout the reporting period
  • Formal board declaration of material controls effectiveness at balance sheet date
  • Public disclosure of any control failures
  • Evidence of effectiveness throughout the entire financial year

Non-compliance risks:

  • Listing rule breaches
  • Investor relations crisis
  • Director liability

The real timeline: You have time to get this right

“The delayed implementation of provision 29 buys extra time for companies to strengthen internal control frameworks” and prepare robust evidence collection processes.

How these work together: The unified framework

Both share the same fundamental requirement: proving that controls actually work, not just that they exist.

Both expect that boards can prove their control frameworks actually work through “active monitoring, robust documentation and clear accountability.”

ECCTA‘s fraud prevention procedures are essentially Provision 29’s material controls.

Both require the same infrastructure:

  • Risk management processes
  • Control testing
  • Board oversight
  • Evidence collection

Smart organisations use their existing ECCTA implementation as the foundation for Provision 29 compliance, creating unified systems that serve both requirements efficiently.

The Bridgehouse Integrated Solution

We can help you implement this unified approach through:

1. Framework preparation:

  • Map controls together: Align your existing ECCTA controls to Provision 29 material controls
  • Single risk register: Integrate fraud, financial, operational and compliance risks in one framework
  • Unified board review: Design one process covering both requirements with evidence trails

2. Implementation & monitoring: Throughout 2026

  • Integrated testing: Establish combined testing cycles with materiality filtering and assurance pathways
  • Evidence collection: Build documentation supporting both regulatory requirements throughout the financial year
  • Continuous monitoring: Implement real-time dashboards for joint oversight of both requirements

3. Board support & disclosure: 2027 reporting

  • Combined disclosure: Design coordinated annual report sections for both requirements
  • Board-ready materials: Prepare materials for annual declarations and public disclosures
  • Ongoing support: Provide updates and guidance for regulatory developments

Why choose Bridgehouse?

  1. Deep regulatory expertise in both requirements and their integration
  2. Proven unified approach reducing compliance burden
  3. Board-ready solutions designed for regulatory scrutiny
  4. Sector specialisation across listed, financial services and large private companies

How we can support your organisation:

  • Independent readiness and risk assessments
  • “Associated‑persons” mapping
  • Internal control framework design
  • Support with board reporting and evidence gathering

Turn regulatory pressure into competitive advantage. One framework. Complete compliance.

Get in touch

We would be pleased to answer any queries or have an informal chat to discuss your possible governance needs.